Case Document

100%Judiciary

HCA 597/2021

[2023] HKCFI 1034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 597 OF 2021

________________________

BETWEEN

	李明實，方壘 AND 史洪源 (SUING ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND THE OTHER EMPLOYEES EMPLOYED BY OR BY THE GROUP OF COMPANIES UNDER 和利時科技集團有限公司 (TRANSLATED AND KNOWN AS HOLLYSYS GROUP COMPANY LIMITED))	1^st Plaintiffs
	DR. CHANGLI WANG (王常力博士)	2^nd Plaintiff
	PLUS VIEW INVESTMENTS LIMITED	3^rd Plaintiff
	and
	ACE LEAD PROFITS LIMITED	1^st Defendant
	SHAO BAIQING (邵柏慶)	2^nd Defendant

________________________

Before:

Hon K Yeung J in Chambers

Dates of Statement of Costs and Reply by the 1^st to 3^rd Plaintiffs:	9 and 31 March 2023
Date of List of Objections by the 1^st and 2^nd Defendants:	24 March 2023
Date of Decision on Costs:	21 April 2023

________________________

DECISION
ON COSTS

________________________

1.By my decision of 20 January 2023[1], I refused Ds’ application for leave to appeal. I made a costs order nisi, to be absolute within 14 days, that Ps shall have the costs of the NOA Summons, to be assessed summarily, which assessment shall not be proceeded with until the final disposal of their renewed leave application to the Court of Appeal, or the expiry of the period for Ds to so apply if they ultimately do not make one.

2.Ds have not renewed their leave application to the Court of Appeal.

3.I have considered the Statement of Costs, Objections, and Reply lodged.

4.Given the nature of the application and the engagement of 3 counsel, I agree with the objections that items B1 (Attendance on Clients), C2 (Perusing and considering Ds’ Skeleton Submissions) and C3 (Perusing, considering and making comments on Ps’ Written Submissions) are too high. I also agree that Mr Lin’s fee of HK$200,000 is too high, which I reduce to HK$150,000.

5.Adopting a broad brush approach, I summarily assess the costs at HK$210,000.