Read the full judgment text of CACV 000809/2001 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 June 2001.
2. The application is made pursuant to Order 59 Rule 10(5) of the Rules of the High Court. In the affirmation of Chu Kuo Fai Gordon, a partner of the firm of solicitors acting for the plaintiff, two grounds for security for costs are set out, namely, the appeal is an abuse of the process of this court and the defendants are believed to be impecunious.
Cites 1 case