Workwise Corporation v. The Occupier(S) of Lot No 250, Section a of Lot No 251, Sub-section 2 and Sub-section 3 of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No 265 and Lot No 266 All in Demarcation District No 111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong and Another

Case No.DCMP 1067/2018[2023] HKDC 447

Court

District Court

Date04 Apr 2023

Judge—

Case Document

100%

DCMP 1067/2018

[2023] HKDC 447

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO 1067 OF 2018

--------------------------

	IN THE MATTER OF All those pieces or parcels of land now known and registered in the Yuen Long Land Registry as Lot No 250, Section A of Lot No 251, Sub-Section 2 and Sub-Section 3 of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No 265 and Lot No 266 all in Demarcation District No 111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong (the “Land”).
	and
	IN THE MATTER OF Order 113 Rule 1 of the Rules of the District Court, Cap 336H.

--------------------------

BETWEEN
	WORKWISE CORPORATION	Plaintiff
	and
	THE OCCUPIER(S) of Lot No 250, Section A of Lot No 251, Sub-Section 2 and Sub-Section 3 of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No 265 and Lot No 266 all in Demarcation District No 111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong	1^st Defendant
	NGAI LING MIU EMILY	2^nd Defendant

--------------------------

Before:

His Honour Judge KC Chan in Court

Dates of Hearing:	16-20 August 2021, 15 October 2021 and 10 October 2022
Date of Judgment:	4 April 2023
Date of Corrigendum:	6 July 2023

--------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

--------------------------------

Notice is hereby given that the following amendments be made to the Judgment dated 4 April 2023:-

Paragraph 76 at page 26 lines 4 and 5: The words “repeatedly flagged complaints about” be deleted and be replaced by the words “objected to”.

Paragraph 76 at page 26 line 7: The words “objection or” be deleted.

( KC Chan )
District Judge

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Related Cases

Ranked by citation overlap · cases that cite each other appear first

Workwise Corporation v. The Occupier(S) of Lot No.250, Section a of Lot No.251, Sub-section 2 and Sub-section 3 of Section B of Lot No.251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No.251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No.265 and Lot No.266 All in Demarcation District No.111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong and Another

CAMP 258/2023 · Court of Appeal

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Workwise Corporation v. The Occupier(S) of Lot No.250, Section a of Lot No.251, Sub-section 2 and Sub-section 3 of Section B of Lot No.251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No.251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No.265 and Lot No.266 All in Demarcation District No.111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong and Another

Court of Appeal

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCMP 1067/2018

Workwise Corporation v. The Occupier(S) of Lot No 250, Section a of Lot No 251, Sub-section 2 and Sub-section 3 of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No 265 and Lot No 266 All in Demarcation District No 111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong and Another

Workwise Corporation v. The Occupier(S) of Lot No 250, Section a of Lot No 251, Sub-section 2 and Sub-section 3 of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Section B of Lot No 251, The Remaining Portion of Lot No 265 and Lot No 266 All in Demarcation District No 111, Yuen Long, New Territories, Hong Kong and Another