The Bar Council v. Mark Richard Charlton Sutherland

Read the full judgment text of CACV 365/2019 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 21 June 2023.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 365/2019[2023] HKCA 786
Court
Court of Appeal
Date21 Jun 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 365/2019

[2023] HKCA 786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 365 OF 2019

(ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE BARRISTERS

DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF THE HONG KONG

SPECIAL ADMINSTRATIVE REGION

MADE ON 18 JULY 2019)

________________

  IN THE MATTER OF the Barristers Disciplinary Tribunal
  and
  IN THE MATTER OF section 37B(1) of the Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159 of the Laws of Hong Kong) and Order 59 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4, Sub Leg A of the Laws of Hong Kong)

________________

BETWEEN

  THE BAR COUNCIL Applicant
  and  
  MARK RICHARD CHARLTON SUTHERLAND Respondent

________________

Before : Hon Kwan VP and Cheung JA in Court
Date of Decision : 21 June 2023

________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________

Page 2 [2 (1)]:-

“Whether a disciplinary judge who has been instrumental as an informant and/or complaint…”

should read as

“Whether a disciplinary judge who has been instrumental as an informant and/or complainant…”

Dated this 31st day of July 2023

  (Fansilia Lai)
for Registrar, High Court