Vdr, Ba v. Toy

Read the full judgment text of FCMP 171/2020 on BabelCite. This FCMP judgment was delivered on 30 November 2022.

1. In paragraph 12 at page 5, “Father’s Counsel Mr. Baker” in line D should read “Father’s Solicitors”.

Cites 2 cases

Case No.FCMP 171/2020[2022] HKFC 260
Court
FCMP
Date30 Nov 2022
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FCMP 171 / 2020

[2022] HKFC 260

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 171 OF 2020

_______________________

 

IN THE MATTER of xxxx, a girl, born on xxx 2014 and xxxx, a girl, born on xxx 2016

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of Section 3(1)(a) & 10(1) of the Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap.13)

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER of sections 3 & 5 of the Domestic and Cohabitation Relationships Violence Ordinance (Cap.189)

__________

BETWEEN

  VDR, BA Applicant

and

  TOY Respondent

_____________

Coram: His Honour Judge G. Own in Chambers (By Paper Disposal)
Date of Decision : 30 November 2022

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

1.In paragraph 12 at page 5, “Father’s Counsel Mr. Baker” in line D should read “Father’s Solicitors”.


Dated the 14th day of September 2023

  (Cecilia Yip)(Ms.)
  Clerk to His Honour Judge G. Own

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under FCMP 171/2020