Read the full judgment text of CACV 000088/1991 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 November 1991.
1. The petitioner seeks to wind up two very closely associated companies. Thus we have two sets of, I think, identical proceedings, save for the name of the company in each. The petitioner owns 25% of the shares in each company. The balance is owned by a gentleman who is her brother-in-law.The claim for winding up the company is under the just and equitable provision of the Companies Ordinance but there is an alternate claim for relief as an oppressed minority.