HKSAR v. Chan Lap Ming Castor
Read the full judgment text of CACC 32/2022 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 8 August 2023 before Macrae Acting CJHC, Zervos JA.
1. In paragraph 40, in the first sentence, “7 years’ imprisonment” should be replaced by “8 years’ imprisonment”. In the last sentence, “4 years and 8 months’ imprisonment for his plea alone.” should be replaced by “5 years and 4 months’ imprisonment for his plea alone, which we further reduce to 5 years’ imprisonment for his other mitigation.”.
Outcome: Appeal allowed; original sentence quashed; sentence of 5 years' imprisonment substituted.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 2 cases
|
CACC 32/2022, [2023] HKCA 1125 On Appeal from [2022] HKCFI 595 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 32 OF 2022 (ON APPEAL FROM HCCC NO 142 OF 2021) ________________________
________________________
_____________________ C O R R I G E N D U M _____________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Reasons for Judgment dated 3 November 2023:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under CACC 32/2022