Crb (A Firm) v. Mark Richard Charlton Sutherland

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1895/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 20 November 2023.

1. On page 4, paragraph 10 line L, “… relied on way of…” should be read as “… relied on by way of…”.

Cited by 3 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCA 1895/2020[2023] HKCFI 2984
Court
High Court CFI
Date20 Nov 2023
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1895/2020

[2023] HKCFI 2984

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 1895 OF 2020

(Transferred from DCCJ 4528/2019)

_____________

BETWEEN

  CRB (a firm) Plaintiff
  and  
  MARK RICHARD CHARLTON SUTHERLAND Defendant

_____________

Before: Hon Cheng J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 8 November 2023
Date of Decision: 20 November 2023
Date of Corrigendum: 29 November 2023

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Decision of the Honourable Madam Justice Cheng dated 20 November 2023

1.On page 4, paragraph 10 line L, “… relied on way of…” should be read as “… relied on by way of…”.

2.On page 7, paragraph 16 line B, “… counsel for Mr Sutherland…” should be read as “… counsel for CRB…”.

3.On page 9 paragraph 24 line R, “… counsel for CRB…” should be read as “… counsel for Mr Sutherland…”.

4.On page 10 paragraph 25 line B, “Mr Sutherland submitted…” should be read as “Mr Hughes submitted…”.

5.On page 12 paragraph 33 line Q, delete the words “… of the context…”.

6.On page 13 paragraph 34 line O, “… paragraph 1…” should be read as “… paragraph 2…”.

7.On page 14 paragraph 35 line B, “… paragraphs 2 and 3…” should be read as “… paragraphs 3 and 4…”.

  (Michael Chan)
Clerk to the Honourable
Madam Justice Cheng

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1895/2020