Limbu Jagat Bahadur v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1322/2019 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 9 January 2024.
1. Page 1, the second paragraph should read as “The applicant did not request an oral hearing. Pursuant to Order 53, rule 3(3) of the Rules of the High Court (“RHC”), his application is dealt with on paper.”.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCAL 1322/2019 [2023] HKCFI 3324 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 1322 of 2019
____________________________ CORRIGENDUM ____________________________ Kindly note that the following correction in the Form CALL-1 handed down by Deputy High Court Judge K.W. Lung： 1.Page 1, the second paragraph should read as “The applicant did not request an oral hearing. Pursuant to Order 53, rule 3(3) of the Rules of the High Court (“RHC”), his application is dealt with on paper.”. Dated the 9th day of January 2024
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1322/2019