楊佩玲 v. Super Best Investment Ltd
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1465/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 10 January 2024.
1. I refer to my Decisions handed down on 29 September and 17 November 2023 [1] .
Cites 3 cases
|
HCA 1465/2022 [2024] HKCFI 126 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 1465 OF 2022 ____________________
____________________
________________________________ DECISION ON COSTS (2) ________________________________ 1.I refer to my Decisions handed down on 29 September and 17 November 2023[1]. 2.I have considered the Statement of Costs and Reply filed on behalf of D, and the List of Objections filed on P’s behalf. 3.I agree that Items C1, C3, D1 and D2 are excessive. For C and D, and adopting a broad-brush approach, I allow only 20 hours in total. 4.I find Counsel’s fees to be reasonable. 5.Overall, I summarily assess the total costs, after discount, at HK$167,000. 6.I make no further costs order in respect of this assessment.
List of Objections by Chung & Kwan, for the Plaintiff Submissions on Costs and Reply by Leung & Lien, for the Defendant [1] [2023] HKCFI 2494 and [2023] HKCFI 2998 respectively. The summary assessment in relation to P’s summons for leave to appeal will be dealt with separately. |
Cases cited in this judgment
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1465/2022