楊佩玲 v. Super Best Investment Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCA 1465/2022 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 7 February 2024.

1. I refer for background to my Decisions handed down on 29 September 2023 [1] and 11 December 2023 [2] .

Cited by 4 cases · Cites 2 cases

Case No.HCA 1465/2022[2024] HKCFI 434
Court
High Court CFI
Date07 Feb 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCA 1465/2022

[2024] HKCFI 434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1465 OF 2022

__________________

BETWEEN    
楊佩玲 Plaintiff
AND
SUPER BEST INVESTMENT LIMITED
(佳達投資有限公司)
Defendant

__________________

Before: Hon K Yeung J in Chambers
Date of Statement of Costs by the Defendant: 27 December 2023
Date of Decision on Costs: 7 February 2024

_________________________________

DECISION ON COSTS (3)

_________________________________

1.I refer for background to my Decisions handed down on 29 September 2023[1] and 11 December 2023[2].

2.This Decision concerns D’s costs of and occasioned by the Leave Summons (see §23 of the Decision of 11 December 2023).

3.I have considered D’s Statement of Costs.  No objection has been filed by P.

4.In my view, items C1 and C3 are too high.  Counsel’s fee is reasonable.

5.Adopting a broad-brush approach, I summarily assess the costs at HK$70,000.

  (Keith Yeung)
  Judge of the Court of First Instance
  High Court

Statement of Costs by Leung & Lien, for the Defendant