Ng Yuk Chun v. Austa Beauty Company Ltd t/a Pretty House Beauty Centre
Read the full judgment text of DCPI 912/2021 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 12 January 2024.
1. Line 5 of paragraph 3: “…and diagnosed with macula edema…” should read “…and was diagnosed with macula edema…”.
Cited by 3 cases · Cites 1 case
|
DCPI 912/2021 [2024] HKDC 82 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 912 OF 2021 ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following amendment to the Judgment dated 12 January 2024: - 1.Line 5 of paragraph 3: “…and diagnosed with macula edema…” should read “…and was diagnosed with macula edema…”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCPI 912/2021