呂念迦 v. 香港護士管理局初步調查小組主席

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 1566/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 5 February 2024.

1. At page 6 between line S and T, the words, “Her affirmation stated as follows”, should read as “Her affidavit stated as follows”;

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 1566/2023[2024] HKCFI 146
Court
High Court CFI
Date05 Feb 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 1566/2023

[2024] HKCFI 146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 1566 OF 2023

________________________

BETWEEN

  呂念迦 Applicant

and

  香港護士管理局
初步調查小組主席
Putative Respondent

and

  楊世達醫生 Putative Interested Party

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Application: 4 September 2023
Dates of Submissions: 6 November 2023 and 4 December 2023
Date of Decision: 5 February 2024
Date of Corrigendum: 11 April 2024

________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decision dated 5 February 2024: -

1.At page 6 between line S and T, the words, “Her affirmation stated as follows”, should read as “Her affidavit stated as follows”;

2.At page 12 between line P and Q, the words, “against Dr Yeung in her affirmation”, should read as “against Dr Yeung in her affidavit”;

3.At page 13 between line Q and R, the words, “and in her affirmation”, should read as “and in her affidavit”;

Dated the 11th day of April 2024

  (Alvin Kwok)
  for Registrar, High Court

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 1566/2023