T, Rh v. K, Cs

Read the full judgment text of FCMC 8704/2023 on BabelCite. This Family Court judgment was delivered on 22 May 2024 before H.H. Judge C.K. Chan.

District Court – Matrimonial Causes – Summary Assessment of Costs – Interim Access – Ex-parte Summons – Quantum of Costs – Senior Counsel Fees – Petitioner's summons dismissed – Costs order made against Petitioner – Respondent claimed HK$337,020 – Petitioner proposed HK$161,194 – Court held Senior Counsel involvement justified – Solicitors' costs assessed at HK$70,000 – Counsel fees allowed in full at HK$235,000 – Total costs assessed at HK$305,000 payable forthwith.

Legal issues: Summary assessment of costs

Outcome: Costs order against Petitioner; costs summarily assessed at HK$305,000.

Cites 1 case

Case No.FCMC 8704/2023[2024] HKFC 110
Court
Family Court
Date22 May 2024
JudgeH.H. Judge C.K. Chan
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FCMC 8704/2023

[2024] HKFC 110

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MATRIMONIAL CAUSES NO. 8704 OF 2023

------------------------

BETWEEN

  T, RH Petitioner
  and  
  K, CS Respondent

------------------------

Coram: H.H. Judge C.K. Chan in Chambers (Not Open to Public)
Mode of Hearing: By way of written submissions
Date of Handing Down Decision: 22 May 2024

-----------------------

D E C I S I O N
(Summary Assessment of Costs)

------------------------

1.On 17 April 2024, I dismissed the Petitioner Father (“F”)’s ex-parte summons (on notice) for interim access and made costs order against him. I also directed that the costs order is to be summarily assessed which I now do.

2.The Respondent Mother (“M”) submitted her statement of costs in the sum of HK$337,020 (including Senior Counsel fee of HK$200,000 and junior counsel fee of HK$35,000). F submitted that the total counsel fees of HK$235,000 were excessive. F further submitted that the costs order should be assessed at HK$161,194 only.

3.I note that Senior Counsel have all along been instructed by both sides for many of the previous hearings. For the present ex-parte summons (on notice), F himself has also instructed very experienced Senior Counsel to attend, indicating that the involvement of Senior Counsel was well justified. In the circumstances, I would assess M’s solicitors’ costs at HK$70,000; and counsel fees of HK$235,000 are allowed in full. Therefore, the total costs of M are now summarily assessed at HK$305,000, payable by F forthwith.

  C. K. Chan
District Judge

Representation:

Messrs Hugill & Ip, solicitors for the Petitioner

Messrs. Withers, solicitors for the Respondent