Masanthiah Teerapong v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
|
HCAL 178/2024 [2024] HKCFI 1779 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 178 of 2024 _____________ BETWEEN
_____________
_____________ D E C I S I O N _____________ 1.The applicant applied for extension of time to appeal the Court’s decision by way of Form CALL-1 dated 19 March 2024 (“the Court’s decision”). 2.The Court’s decision dismissed the applicant’s application for leave to apply for judicial review of the Decision dated 9 July 2018 of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office because it was a duplicated application, which is an abuse of the court’s process[1]. 3.The applicant had admitted that it was a duplicated application and he apologized for the duplication. 4.It was on that basis the Court dismissed his application by the Court’s decision. 5.The applicant has no reason to appeal against the Court’s decision. 6.I refuse to extend time for him to appeal out of time.
The applicant was unrepresented. [1] Fabio Arlyn Timogan, Salaudin Rabia & Salaudin Faheem v Evan Ruth, Esq, Adjudicator of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2020] HKCA 971, Hon Lam, Barma and Au JJA, 27 November 2020
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Masanthiah Teerapong v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Nurimah and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Oxina Joan Patricio and Another v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Re Masanthiah Teerapong
Masanthiah Teerapong v. Director of Immigration
Rana Md Rasedui Islam v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 178/2024