Law Yuk-kong v. The Queen

Read the full judgment text of CACC 190/1978 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment.

1. In this case the bail of the appellant was estreated in the Magistrates Court. The magistrate has pointed out to this court that this was a mistake and it is unnecessary for me to say more than that this mistake should be rectified and that the order estreating bail be set aside.

Case No.CACC 190/1978
Court
Court of Appeal
Date
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACC000190/1978

IN THE SUPREME COURT  
   
  Criminal Appeal
  1978 No. 190

BETWEEN:    
  LAW Yuk-kong Appellant
  and  
  THE QUEEN Respondent

Coram: Briggs, C.J.

Date of Judgment: 18th March, 1978.

-----------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------

1. In this case the bail of the appellant was estreated in the Magistrates Court. The magistrate has pointed out to this court that this was a mistake and it is unnecessary for me to say more than that this mistake should be rectified and that the order estreating bail be set aside.

  (Geoffrey Briggs)
  Chief Justice.

Representation:

Appellant in person.

Dick for the Crown/Respondent.