Roderick Miller v. The Law Society of Hong Kong

Read the full judgment text of CACV 529/2018 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 29 July 2024.

1. In paragraph 3, between lines L & M, the words “upon the Law Society’s intervention” should be deleted.

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 529/2018[2024] HKCA 741
Court
Court of Appeal
Date29 Jul 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 529/2018

[2024] HKCA 741

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 529 OF 2018

(ON APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF THE SOLICITORS’

DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL OF 2ND OCTOBER 2018)

_______________

BETWEEN

  RODERICK MILLER Appellant
  and  
  THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG Respondent

_______________

Before: Hon Au and Chow JJA, and Queeny Au-Yeung J in Court
Date of Hearing: 5 March 2024
Closing Date of Further Submission: 18 March 2024
Date of Judgment: 29 July 2024
Date of Corrigendum: 21 August 2024

_______________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_______________

Please note the following corrigenda for the Judgment dated 29 July 2024:

1.In paragraph 3, between lines L & M, the words “upon the Law Society’s intervention” should be deleted.

2.In paragraph 75, between lines R & S, the words “the Law Society’s intervention and” should be deleted.

3.In paragraph 89, between lines J & K, the sentence “and not those arising from the Law Society’s intervention itself” should be deleted.

Dated this 21st day of August 2024

  (Yolanda Chan)
for Registrar, High Court