BabelCite

Yik Ping Chui v. Ombudsman, Ombudsman Office

Read the full judgment text of HCAL 2397/2023 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 January 2024.

1. At page 4 between line N and O, the words, “The Ombudsman Office has continued to not answer my enquiries as of today after repeated requested to clear my doubts fully”, should read as “The Ombudsman Office has continued to not answer my enquiries as of today after repeated requests to clear my doubts fully”;

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCAL 2397/2023[2024] HKCFI 137
Court
High Court CFI
Date12 Jan 2024
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCAL 2397/2023

[2024] HKCFI 137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO 2397 OF 2023

________________________

BETWEEN
  YIK PING CHUI Applicant
  and  
  OMBUDSMAN, OMBUDSMAN OFFICE Putative
    Respondent

________________

Before: Hon Coleman J in Chambers (Open to Public)
Date of Decision: 12 January 2024
Date of Corrigendum: 26 August 2024

_____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Decisions dated 12 January 2024: -

1.At page 4 between line N and O, the words, “The Ombudsman Office has continued to not answer my enquiries as of today after repeated requested to clear my doubts fully”, should read as “The Ombudsman Office has continued to not answer my enquiries as of today after repeated requests to clear my doubts fully”;

Dated the 26th day of August 2024

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court

Cites 1 case

Cases cited in this judgment

Yik Ping Chui v. Ombudsman, Ombudsman Office
HCAL 2397/2023
High Court CFI12 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Yik Ping Chui v. Ombudsman, Ombudsman Office
High Court CFI12 Jan 2024
Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCAL 2397/2023

Yik Ping Chui v. Ombudsman, Ombudsman Office
High Court CFI12 Jan 2024