Read the full judgment text of DCMP 2516/2022 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 10 September 2024.
1. Page 8, paragraph 33 be added to read as, “Mr. Lee Yee Hung, counsel for the plaintiff (“Mr. Lee”), observed that despite claiming that these tenancy agreements are duly stamped, the 1 st TA, the 3 rd TA and the 4 th TA were not stamped when the 1 st defendant first produced them under his (1 st ) Affirmation of 10 October 2022 thus rendering them inadmissible as evidence at that point. In fact, the 1 st TA and the 3 rd TA were only stamped on 24 October 2022 and the 4 th TA was only stamped
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case