Li Qing v. Sfund International Investment Fund Management Ltd

Read the full judgment text of HCLA 5/2024 on BabelCite. This HCLA judgment was delivered on 13 December 2024.

1. I refer to §§43 and 44 of my Judgment handed down on 31 October 2024 [1] for the costs order which I have made against C.

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCLA 5/2024[2024] HKCFI 3606
Court
HCLA
Date13 Dec 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCLA 5/2024

[2024] HKCFI 3606

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

LABOUR TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO 5 OF 2024

(ON APPEAL FROM LABOUR TRIBUNAL CLAIM NO 1818 OF 2023)

__________________

BETWEEN    
李青 (LI QING) Claimant
(Respondent)
AND
廣州基金國際股權投資基金管理有限公司 (SFUND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED) Defendant
(Appellant)

__________________

Before: Hon K Yeung J in Chambers
Dates of Statement of Costs and Reply
by the Defendant (Appellant):
13 November and
4 December 2024
Date of List of Objections by the
Claimant (Respondent):
27 November 2024
Date of Decision on Costs: 13 December 2024

____________________

DECISION ON COSTS

____________________

1.I refer to §§43 and 44 of my Judgment handed down on 31 October 2024[1] for the costs order which I have made against C.

2.I have considered the Statement of Costs, List of Objections and Reply which parties have separately lodged.

3.For Item C (Communication), I agree with C that total time of 21.4 hours by 2 fee earners (for $108,000 in total) are excessive.  I allow only HK$70,000 in total.

4.For Item D (Professional Work), I find the total costs claimed of HK$183,600 excessive.  I allow only HK$100,000.

5.For Item E (Counsel Fees), I find the total fees of HK$100,000 for drafting and 2 hearings reasonable.

6.Adopting a broad-brush approach, I summarily assess D’s costs at HK$278,000.

  (Keith Yeung)
  Judge of the Court of First Instance
  High Court

Statement of Costs and Reply by ONC Lawyers, for the Defendant (Appellant)

List of Objections by Siao, Wen & Leung, for the Claimant (Respondent)

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCLA 5/2024