Team Success Engineering Ltd v. Yau Choi Lin and Others

Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 5980/2018 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 16 December 2024.

1. Page 31, paragraph 37 (1), line Q, “Taking Aerial Photo no CN7598 on 30.6.1994 as an example, it can be observed that 4 cars of different sizes were apparently parked there at the same time, with still considerable space (around ¼ of Lot 256 SF, ½ of Lot 256 SE, and the whole of Lot 246 SD) vacant.” should read “Taking Aerial Photo no CN7598 on 30.6.1994 as an example, it can be observed that 4 cars of different sizes were apparently parked there at the same time, with still considerable spa

Cited by 2 cases · Cites 1 case

Case No.DCCJ 5980/2018[2024] HKDC 2129
Court
District Court
Date16 Dec 2024
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

DCCJ 5980/2018

[2024] HKDC 2129

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 5980 OF 2018

------------------------

BETWEEN

  TEAM SUCCESS ENGINEERING LIMITED Plaintiff
  and  
  YAU CHOI LIN 1st Defendant
  YAU SHING YUEN 2nd Defendant
  LAU WAI KIT 3rd Defendant

------------------------

Before: Deputy District Judge Adrian Wong in Court
Dates of Hearing: 4 to 6 and 14 June 2024
Date of Judgment: 16 December 2024
Date of Corrigendum: 17 December 2024

--------------------------------

CORRIGENDUM

--------------------------------

Notice is hereby given that the following amendments be made to the Judgment dated 16 December 2024:-

1.Page 31, paragraph 37 (1), line Q, “Taking Aerial Photo no CN7598 on 30.6.1994 as an example, it can be observed that 4 cars of different sizes were apparently parked there at the same time, with still considerable space (around ¼ of Lot 256 SF, ½ of Lot 256 SE, and the whole of Lot 246 SD) vacant.” should read “Taking Aerial Photo no CN7598 on 30.6.1994 as an example, it can be observed that 4 cars of different sizes were apparently parked there at the same time, with still considerable space (around ¼ of Lot 256 SF, ½ of Lot 256 SE, and the whole of Lot 256 SD) vacant.”.

2.Page 63, paragraph 62, line Q, “Such approach is with respect entirely wrong and without basis for the reasons stated in section adverse possession under legal principles above.” should read “Such approach is with respect entirely wrong and without basis for the reasons stated in paragraphs 53 to 58 under legal principles stated above.”.

3.Page 65, paragraph 64, line N, “Much of what she says were indeed not so support by documents.” should read “Much of what she says were indeed not so supported by documents.”.

  (Sissy S.C. Chan (Miss))
Clerk to Deputy District Judge Adrian Wong

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 5980/2018