R. v. M.D. Khasru Mia
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 1057/1995 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 January 1996.
1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 18 months for possession of a forged travel document. The range of sentences for this offence is from six months to 18 months. The normal sentence is nine months. I therefore reduced the sentence to one of nine months and allowed the appeal accordingly.
Cited by 1 case
|
HCMA001057/1995 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONG KONG (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL
--------------- Coram : Hon Duffy, J. in Court Date of hearing : 12 January 1996 Date of handing down judgment : 17 January 1996 ------------------------ J U D G M E N T ------------------------ Duffy, J.: 1. This was an appeal against a sentence of 18 months for possession of a forged travel document. The range of sentences for this offence is from six months to 18 months. The normal sentence is nine months. I therefore reduced the sentence to one of nine months and allowed the appeal accordingly. Representation: Mr David Chan, S.C.C., for Crown Mr David Tolliday-Wright (D.L.A.) for Appellant
|
Other judgments that cite this case