Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1898/2021 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 January 2025.
1. Page 29, paragraph 39 (5), line P, “How D2 was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to P when on D2’s case the annotations should have been in existence since 14.3.2020 is regrettably suspicious and questionable.” should read “How P was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to D2 without D2 raising queries when on D2’s case the document and annotation
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case