Crown Well International Ltd v. Billion Ace Ltd and Another
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 1898/2021 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 24 January 2025.
1. Page 29, paragraph 39 (5), line P, “How D2 was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to P when on D2’s case the annotations should have been in existence since 14.3.2020 is regrettably suspicious and questionable.” should read “How P was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to D2 without D2 raising queries when on D2’s case the document and annotation
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
DCCJ 1898/2021 [2025] HKDC 132 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO 1898 OF 2021 ------------------------
------------------------
-------------------------------- CORRIGENDUM -------------------------------- Notice is hereby given that the following amendments be made to the Judgment dated 24 January 2025:- 1.Page 29, paragraph 39 (5), line P, “How D2 was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to P when on D2’s case the annotations should have been in existence since 14.3.2020 is regrettably suspicious and questionable.” should read “How P was apparently able to, after 14.3.2020 but prior to the PTR, pass a clean unannotated copy of the same document to D2 without D2 raising queries when on D2’s case the document and annotations should have been passed and in existence since 14.3.2020 is regrettably suspicious and questionable.”.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 1898/2021