Butt Tze Leung v. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, The Body Corporate Having Management and Control of the Optometry Clinic At the Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Others

Read the full judgment text of HCPI 726/2018 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 17 April 2025.

1. At page 12, paragraph 54, between lines E and F, “Yu has not come forward to assert …” should read “Tran has not come forward to assert …”

Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case

Case No.HCPI 726/2018[2025] HKCFI 1587
Court
High Court CFI
Date17 Apr 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCPI 726/2018

[2025] HKCFI 1587

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO 726 OF 2018

________________________

BETWEEN

  BUTT TZE LEUNG (畢子良) Plaintiff

and

  THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
(香港理工大學),the body corporate having management
and control of THE OPTOMETRY CLINIC AT THE
HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY
(香港理工大學眼科視光學診所)
 
  (香港理工大學眼科視光學診所) 1st Defendant
  YU SIN YING 2nd Defendant
  TRAN THI LAI 3rd Defendant

________________________

Before: Hon Leung J in Chambers
Dates of Hearing: 12 December 2024
Date of Decision: 17 April 2025
Date of Corrigendum: 31 July 2025

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


Please note the following amendments to the Decision dated 17 April 2025:

1.At page 12, paragraph 54, between lines E and F, “Yu has not come forward to assert …” should read “Tran has not come forward to assert …”

2.At page 20, paragraph 72(9), line O, “filing” should read “filling”

  (Minnie Ko)
  for Registrar, High Court