Le, Thi Dung v. Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

HCAL 600/2020

[2025] HKCFI 3064

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 600 OF 2020

_____________

_____________

_____________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

_____________________________

Please note the following correction(s) in the Form CALL-1 dated 31 July 2025:

Page 1, “Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1.  The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent, naming only the Director of Immigration as the Putative Interested Party, and identifying the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office dated 24 November 2017 as the Judgment, order, decision or other proceeding in respect of which relief is sought;

2.  Application to withdraw the application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be granted; and

3.  Leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

should read

“Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1.  The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent, naming only the Director of Immigration as the Putative Interested Party, and identifying the decision of the Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office dated 24 November 2017 as the Judgment, order, decision or other proceeding in respect of which relief is sought; and

2.  Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”