Rizaul v. Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

HCAL 567/2020

[2025] HKCFI 3527

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 567 OF 2020

_____________

_____________

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following correction(s) in the Form CALL-1 dated 13 August 2025:

1)  Page 1, “Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent;

2. Leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

should read

“Order by Deputy High Court Judge (Non-refoulement Claims) YW Hew:

1. The Form 86 is amended on the Court’s own motion, naming only the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as the Putative Respondent; and

2. Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

Application for leave to apply for Judicial Review be dismissed.”

2)  Page 7 “For completeness, I also dismiss the applications made in the Form 86 for an extension of time, continuation of anonymity or sealing orders which the Applicant claims were made at the commencement of these proceedings, and for costs.”

should read

“For completeness, I refuse to make the orders sought in the Form 86 for an extension of time, continuation of anonymity or sealing orders which the Applicant claims were made at the commencement of these proceedings, and for costs.”