Devinder Singh v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office

HCAL 678/2020

[2025] HKCFI 3625

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST

NO. 678 OF 2020

_____________

_____________

____________________

CORRIGENDUM

____________________

Please note the following correction(s) in the Form CALL-1 dated 21 August 2025:

Page 1

“Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office Putative Respondent”

should read

“Torture Claims Appeal Board / Putative

Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office          Respondent”

and

Page 4, Paragraph 14:

“Moreover, given the vague nature of the allegation I do not accept that the Applicant is seeking to rely on, or has established that he is seeking to rely on, … ”

“I hence reject the allegations as being inadmissible and irrelevant.”

should read

“Moreover, given the vague nature of the allegation, even if it could be taken as amounting to evidence (rather than merely submission), such is bare and unsupported and I do not see that the Applicant is seeking to rely on, or has established that he is seeking to rely on… ”

“I hence reject the allegations as being inadmissible, unsubstantiated, and irrelevant.”

and

Page 6:

“Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office” should read “Torture Claims Appeal Board/Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office”