So Sin Ying v. J. v. Fitness Ltd

Read the full judgment text of CACV 246/2023 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 October 2025.

1. In paragraph 19, line L - M “JV applied to replace the Judgment Sum…” should read as “So applied to replace the Judgment Sum…”

Cited by 1 case · Cites 2 cases

Case No.CACV 246/2023[2025] HKCA 948
Court
Court of Appeal
Date24 Oct 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 246/2023, [2025] HKCA 948

On Appeal From [2023] HKCFI 1792

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 246 OF 2023

(ON APPEAL FROM HCPI NO 1023 OF 2014)

_______________

BETWEEN

  SO SIN YING Plaintiff
  and  
  J. V. FITNESS LIMITED Defendant

_______________

Before: Hon Kwan VP, Au and G Lam JJA in Court
Date of Hearing: 8 January 2025
Date of Judgment: 24 October 2025
Date of Corrigendum: 31 October 2025

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 24 October 2025:

1.In paragraph 19, line L - M “JV applied to replace the Judgment Sum…” should read as “So applied to replace the Judgment Sum…”

2.In paragraph 19, line Q - R “However, he also accepted So’s contention that he could not amend the Order…” should read as “However, he also accepted JV’s contention that he could not amend the Order…”

  (Yolanda Chan)
for Registrar, High Court

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under CACV 246/2023