Read the full judgment text of HCMA 279/2025 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 18 November 2025.
1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of “selling goods to which a forged trade mark was applied” (“Charge 1”) contrary to section 9(2) as read with section 18(1) of the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, Cap. 362 (the “Ordinance”) and a charge of “possession of goods for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacture goods to which a forged trade mark was applied” (“Charge 2”), contrary to the same section of the Ordinance. Upon his guilty plea, the Magistrate sentenced him to 2 months’
Cites 5 cases