HKSAR v. Muhammad Waqas

Read the full judgment text of HCCC 33/2024 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 October 2025.

Cited by 1 case

Case No.HCCC 33/2024[2025] HKCFI 6400
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 Oct 2025
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCC 33/2024

[2025] HKCFI 6400

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CRIMINAL CASE NO 33 OF 2024

________________________

  HKSAR  
  v  
  Muhammad Waqas(華加士)  

________________________

Before:  Hon Andrew Chan J
Date:  6 October 2025 at 9.44 am
Present:  Mr Marcus Lee, SPP of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
  Ms Lee Shin-man Cindy, instructed by H Y Leung & Co LLP, assigned by DLA, for the accused
Offence:   Trafficking in a dangerous drug (販運危險藥物)

________________________

Transcript of the Audio Recording
of the Sentence in the above Case

________________________


COURT: The defendant has pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in a dangerous drug, contrary to section 4 of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance. He is committed to this court for sentence.

In the evening on 18 April 2022, police officers on patrol car duty spotted a car driven by the defendant moving suspiciously. They tried to intercept the car. Eventually, they located the car outside a garage. Upon seeing the arrival of the police, the defendant fled the car, leaving his girlfriend behind.

A search of the car uncovered 42.7 grammes of cocaine. The defendant was put on wanted list. He was finally arrested by the police on 27 July 2022. The defendant admitted that he was trafficking in the cocaine found inside the car at the material time.

The defendant is now 31, educated up to Form 3 level in Hong Kong. The defendant has six criminal records none relating to trafficking in dangerous drug. Prior to his arrest, he was unemployed.

Mitigation letters from the defendant’s sister and inmates have been produced. In particular, the inmates speak highly of him.

The starting point for trafficking in 42.7 grammes of cocaine is one of 7 years and 5 months’ imprisonment. There is nothing in this case pointing to the role played by the defendant was anything other than a simple courier. Apart from his earliest plea, there are no other mitigating factors in my view in this particular case.

For the sole offence the defendant stands convicted, he is therefore sentenced to 59 months’ imprisonment. That is 4 years and 11 months.

I/we certify that to the best of my/our ability and skill, the foregoing is a true transcript of the audio recording of the above proceedings
BT Sig
Bruce Jericho Fuellas Torres
Date: 10 October 2025

Cited by 1 case

Other judgments that cite this case