Law Ying Wah v. The Personal Representative of the Estate of Cheng Tai Tseung, Deceased
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 3068/2024 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 7 January 2026.
1. Page 9, paragraph 25, line F to H: “ Since the plaintiff’s pleaded case is that his possession commenced in 1984, section 38A is not relied upon. The relevant limitation period in the present case is therefore 12 years.” should read as “ The plaintiff’s pleaded case is that his possession commenced in 1984, but section 38A is not replied upon in counsel’s submissions . The relevant limitation period in the present case is in my view 20 years.”; and
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
|
DCCJ 3068/2024 [2026] HKDC 55 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO 3068 OF 2024 ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum for the Judgment dated 7 January 2026: - 1.Page 9, paragraph 25, line F to H: “Since the plaintiff’s pleaded case is that his possession commenced in 1984, section 38A is not relied upon. The relevant limitation period in the present case is therefore 12 years.” should read as “The plaintiff’s pleaded case is that his possession commenced in 1984, but section 38A is not replied upon in counsel’s submissions. The relevant limitation period in the present case is in my view 20 years.”; and 2.Page 9, paragraph 27(1), line S to T: “… by virtue of section 7(2) of the Limitation Ordinance, Cap 347;” should read as “… by virtue of section 7(2) and section 38A of the Limitation Ordinance, Cap 347;”. Dated the 20th day of January 2026
|
Cases cited in this judgment
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 3068/2024