北京誠義豪泰投資管理有限公司 v. Zhang Yuping (also known as Cheung Yu Ping) and Another

Read the full judgment text of HCCT 1/2025 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 6 February 2026.

1. In page 6, paragraph 11.2, line M, “the Plaintiff’s …” should read “the 1st Defendant’s …”.

Cited by 3 cases

Case No.HCCT 1/2025[2026] HKCFI 925
Court
High Court CFI
Date06 Feb 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

HCCT 1/2025

[2026] HKCFI 925

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGSNO 1 OF 2025

____________

  IN THE MATTER of Section 45 of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap 609)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Section 21M of the High Court Ordinance (Cap 4)
  and
  IN THE MATTER of Order 29 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A) and Inherent Jurisdiction

____________

BETWEEN    
  北京誠義豪泰投資管理有限公司 Plaintiff

and

  ZHANG YUPING (also known as
CHEUNG YU PING) (張瑜平)
1st Defendant

and

  FUNG KA KIU ANN ( 馮稼喬) Intended
2nd Defendant

____________

Before:   Hon Cheng J in Chambers
Date of Hearing:   6 February 2026
Date of Decision:  6 February 2026
Date of Corrigendum:  17 April 2026

____________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

____________________

Please note the following corrigenda in the Decision dated 6 February 2026.

1.In page 6, paragraph 11.2, line M, “the Plaintiff’s …” should read “the 1st Defendant’s …”.

2.In page 6, paragraph 11.4, line Q, “the Plaintiff …” should read “the 1st Defendant …”.

  (Michael Chan)
  Clerk to the Honourable
  Madam Justice Cheng