Tam Yuk Ching and Others v. Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm)
Read the full judgment text of HCA 1511/2020 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 29 April 2026.
1. At page 6, paragraph 11, line 1, “The Plaintiffs” should read as “HN”.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case
Case No.HCA 1511/2020[2026] HKCFI 2498
Court
High Court CFI
Date29 Apr 2026
Judge—
Case Document
100%Judiciary
|
HCA 1511/2020 [2026] HKCFI 2498 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO 1511 OF 2020 __________________
__________________
________________________ C O R R I G E N D U M ________________________ Please note the following amendment in the Decision on Costs dated 29 April 2026:- 1.At page 6, paragraph 11, line 1, “The Plaintiffs” should read as “HN”.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cites 1 case
Cases cited in this judgment
Cited by 1 case
Other judgments that cite this case
Other Judgments in This Case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1511/2020
Tam Yuk Ching and Others v. Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm) and Another
High Court CFI30 Dec 2022
Tam Yuk Ching and Others v. Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm) and Another
High Court CFI28 Feb 2023
Tam Yuk Ching and Others v. Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm)
High Court CFI06 Jan 2026
Tam Yuk Ching and Others v. Hoosenally & Neo (A Firm)
High Court CFI29 Apr 2026