Tam Yuk Fun Toffee v. Secretary for The Civil Service
Read the full judgment text of CACV 203/2024 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 March 2026.
1. In paragraph 3 onpage 3, at line G, “respondent notice” should read “respondent’s notice”.
Cites 1 case
|
CACV 203/2024, [2026] HKCA 389 On appeal from [2024] HKCFI 1020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO 203 OF 2024 (ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 1804 OF 2023) ________________________ BETWEEN
________________________
________________________ CORRIGENDUM ________________________ Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 6 March 2026: 1.In paragraph 3 onpage 3, at line G, “respondent notice” should read “respondent’s notice”. 2.In paragraph 3 onpage 3, between linesH and I, “In respect of Ground 4” should read “In respect of Ground 2”. 3.In paragraph 4 onpage 3, between linesK and L, “Grounds 2, 3 and 4 (as narrowed)” should read “Grounds 2 (as narrowed), 3 and 4”. 4.In paragraph 34 onpage 15, between linesH and I, “seem to be him to be just” should read “seem to him to be just”. 5.In paragraph 47 onpage 22, between lines L and M, “applicants’ solicitors” should read “applicant’s solicitors”. 6.In paragraph 49(1) onpage 23, at line M, “Proceeding” should read “Proceedings”. 7.In paragraph 51 onpage 24, between linesI and J, “in arriving the Decision” should read “in arriving at the Decision”. 8.In paragraph 52(1) onpage 25, between linesG and H, “must invariably starts with” should read “must invariably start with”. 9.In paragraph 52(2) onpage 25, between lines O and P, “Proceeding” should read “Proceedings”. 10.In paragraph 59 onpage 29, between lines M and N, “applicants’ circumstances” should read “applicant’s circumstances”. 11.In paragraph 67(1) onpage 32, between lines R and S, “range or rational balances” should read “range of rational balances”. 12.In paragraph 73 onpage 35, at line G, “for Environment” should read “for the Environment”. 13.In paragraph 74 onpage 35, between lines O and P, “chain or communications” should read “chain of communications”.
|
Cases cited in this judgment