Tam Yuk Fun Toffee v. Secretary for The Civil Service

Read the full judgment text of CACV 203/2024 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 6 March 2026.

1. In paragraph 3 onpage 3, at line G, “respondent notice” should read “respondent’s notice”.

Cites 1 case

Case No.CACV 203/2024[2026] HKCA 389
Court
Court of Appeal
Date06 Mar 2026
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

CACV 203/2024, [2026] HKCA 389

On appeal from [2024] HKCFI 1020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CIVIL APPEAL NO 203 OF 2024

(ON APPEAL FROM HCAL NO 1804 OF 2023)

________________________

BETWEEN

  TAM YUK FUN TOFFEE Applicant
  and  
  SECRETARY FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE Respondent

________________________

Before:  Hon Poon CJHC, Chu VP and Au JA in Court
Date of Hearing:  10 June 2025
Date of Judgment:  6 March 2026
Date of Corrigendum:  17 July 2026

________________________

CORRIGENDUM

________________________


Please note the following corrigendum in the Judgment dated 6 March 2026:

1.In paragraph 3 onpage 3, at line G, “respondent notice” should read “respondent’s notice”.

2.In paragraph 3 onpage 3, between linesH and I, “In respect of Ground 4” should read “In respect of Ground 2”.

3.In paragraph 4 onpage 3, between linesK and L, “Grounds 2, 3 and 4 (as narrowed)” should read “Grounds 2 (as narrowed), 3 and 4”.

4.In paragraph 34 onpage 15, between linesH and I, “seem to be him to be just” should read “seem to him to be just”.

5.In paragraph 47 onpage 22, between lines L and M, “applicants’ solicitors” should read “applicant’s solicitors”.

6.In paragraph 49(1)  onpage 23, at line M, “Proceeding” should read “Proceedings”.

7.In paragraph 51 onpage 24, between linesI and J, “in arriving the Decision” should read “in arriving at the Decision”.

8.In paragraph 52(1)  onpage 25, between linesG and H, “must invariably starts with” should read “must invariably start with”.

9.In paragraph 52(2)  onpage 25, between lines O and P, “Proceeding” should read “Proceedings”.

10.In paragraph 59 onpage 29, between lines M and N, “applicants’ circumstances” should read “applicant’s circumstances”.

11.In paragraph 67(1)  onpage 32, between lines R and S, “range or rational balances” should read “range of rational balances”.

12.In paragraph 73 onpage 35, at line G, “for Environment” should read “for the Environment”.

13.In paragraph 74 onpage 35, between lines O and P, “chain or communications” should read “chain of communications”.

  (Marco SO)
for Registrar, High Court