Chu Sik Chor and Another v. HKSAR

Read the full judgment text of FAMC 4/2000 on BabelCite. This FAMC judgment was delivered on 9 May 2000.

1. There are two applicants before us, seeking leave to appeal against the dismissal of their appeals by Mr Justice Woo JA in the High Court.

Case No.FAMC 4/2000
Court
FAMC
Date09 May 2000
Judge
Case Document
100%Judiciary

FAMC000004/2000

(Not for Circulation)
FAMC No. 4 of 2000

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 4 OF 2000 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA No. 584 OF 1999)

_____________________

Between:
CHU SIK CHOR 1st Applicant
MA YUET YING 2nd Applicant
AND
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION Respondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ and Mr Justice Bokhary PJ

Date of Hearing: 9 May 2000

Date of Determination: 9 May 2000

___________________________

DETERMINATION

___________________________

Mr Justice Litton PJ:

1. There are two applicants before us, seeking leave to appeal against the dismissal of their appeals by Mr Justice Woo JA in the High Court.

2. They were convicted jointly on one charge of common assault in the Western Magistracy. Additionally, the first applicant was convicted of wilfully obstructing a police officer in the due execution of his duty.

3. The facts leading to these convictions have been carefully investigated in the two courts below. It is not the function of the Court of Final Appeal to review the facts all over again. The applicants have brought forward nothing this morning which would justify leave to bring an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.

4. These applications are dismissed.

(Henry Litton) (Charles Ching) (Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge Permanent Judge Permanent Judge

Representation:

Mr Chu Sik Chor, 1st Applicant, in person

Ms Ma Yuet Ying, 2nd Applicant, in person

Mr Arthur Luk and Mr Alex Lee (of Department of Justice) for the Respondent

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under FAMC 4/2000