Apparel Dynamics Ltd v. Alexander David Blois-brooke and Others

Case No.HCA 1446/2026[2026] HKCFI 5038

Court

High Court CFI

Date28 Aug 2026

Judge—

Case Document

100%

HCA 1446/2026

[2026] HKCFI 5038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1446 OF 2026

________________________

BETWEEN

	APPAREL DYNAMICS LIMITED	Plaintiff
and
	ALEXANDER DAVID BLOIS-BROOKE	1st Defendant
	MATTHEW ROBERT GOEBEL	2nd Defendant
	ADAM PAUL GOLDBERG	3rd Defendant
	ARI ANTHONY	4th Defendant
	TOPTIME GROUP LIMITED	5th Defendant
	WHYTECLIFF GROUP LIMITED	6th Defendant
	FRAYTE GLOBAL (HK) CO., LIMITED	7th Defendant
	GOLDSTAR APPAREL PTY LIMITED	8th Defendant
	ARI ANTHONY DESIGN PTY LIMITED	9th Defendant
	SO PUI WAN LOUISA (蘇佩雲)	10th Defendant

________________________

Before:

Deputy High Court Judge Cooper, KC in Chambers (Open to Public)

Date of Hearing:	28 August 2026
Date of Judgment:	28 August 2026
Date of Reasons for Judgment:	21 September 2026
Date of Corrigendum:	28 September 2026

________________________

C O R R I G E N D U M

________________________

Please note the following amendments in the Reasons for Judgment dated 21 September 2026:-

1. At page 2 paragraph 1 line F, should read “I also gave permission to enforce, until 18 September 2026 or further order, the Injunction Order against the Second Defendant. I was also told that …”

2. At page 4 paragraph 8 line C, should read “… against TTHK. I also granted leave to issue a Concurrent Writ out of the jurisdiction on Matthew. I considered …”

3. At page 4 paragraph 10 line N, delete the words “… a concurrent Writ out of the jurisdiction on Matthew, and …”

	(June Lo)
	Clerk to Deputy High Court Judge Cooper, KC

Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error

Other Judgments in This Case

Further hearings and rulings under HCA 1446/2026

Apparel Dynamics Ltd v. Alexander David Blois-brooke and Others

High Court CFI

28 Aug 2026