Wang Hongyu v. Russell Adam Coleman of Court of Appeal
|
HCAL 1641/2026 [2026] HKCFI 5609 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST NO. 1641 of 2026 BETWEEN
Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s Decision (Ord. 53 r. 3) Following;
Order by The Honourable Madam Justice Au-Yeung: Leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed. Reasons: 1.By Form 86 filed on 22 September 2026, the applicant, Mr Wang, seeks leave to apply for judicial review of the decision dated 14 August 2026 of Mr Justice Coleman J (as he then was) in HCAL 1388/2026 (“the Decision”). Mr Wang seeks (i) a declaration that the “leave application case HCAL1388/2026 was inappropriately handled”; (ii) a mandamus requiring Coleman J to amend the Decision in accordance with a correct version edited by Mr Wang (in Exhibit 3 to his supporting affirmation) in order to correct the spelling, grammatical, copying and pasting mistakes, which occurred in the learned Judge’s own writings and in his quotes from Mr Wang. Mr Wang also asks that the amended Decision be uploaded onto the Judiciary’s website and the amended copy be sent to Mr Wang and all the respondents of HCAL 1388/2026. 2.At his request, this oral hearing is held today. 3.This is a wholly frivolous application and abuse of process. Any alleged “mistake” identified by Mr Wang in the Decision could have formed the subject matter of a corrigendum to be issued by the learned Judge instead of issuing this leave application. The so called “mistakes” do not in any way affect the proper comprehension of that Decision. 4.At this oral hearing, Mr Wang confirms that this leave application is to correct those “mistakes”, and is not targeted against the contents of the Decision. In fact, he has not appealed against the Decision. 5.Nothing in Form 86, Mr Wang’s affirmation, or submission at this oral hearing has identified any public law grounds and plainly he is not able to do so in respect of the Decision. 6.Accordingly, I dismiss the application for leave to apply for judicial review. Dated 2nd day of October 2026
Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence
Form CALL-1 |
Summaries and metadata are generated from the judgment. Report an error
Cases cited in this judgment