Secretary for Justice v. Jerry Lui Kin Hong
Read the full judgment text of on BabelCite. was delivered on 3 March 2000.
1. This is the judgment of the Court on costs.
Cited by 1 case
|
FACC000003A/1999 FACC No. 3 of 1999 IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FINAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 1999 (CRIMINAL) (ON APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 378 OF 1998) _____________________
_____________________
Date of Judgment: 3 March 2000 ___________________________________ JUDGMENT ON COSTS ___________________________________ Mr Justice Litton PJ: 1. This is the judgment of the Court on costs. 2. On 14 December 1999 we allowed the Secretary for Justice's appeal and remitted the matter to the Court of Appeal to hear the remaining grounds, reserving the question of costs to be decided after receiving the parties' written submissions. 3. The matter falls within a narrow compass. Mr Lui's conviction was quashed by the Court of Appeal on the basis of a point of law taken by counsel on Mr Lui's behalf; the point was unmeritorious, as determined by our judgment of 14 December 1999. There were other grounds of appeal before the Court of Appeal but these were never considered by the Court of Appeal. They will presumably be now determined by the Court of Appeal, to whom we have remitted the matter. In these circumstances the question of the costs incurred to date in the Court of Appeal should be reserved to be dealt with by that Court. As to the costs incurred in proceedings in this Court, there is no reason why Mr Lui should not be ordered to pay them. We so order.
Representation: Mr Michael Thomas SC (instructed by the Department of Justice), Mr John Reading SC and Mr Joseph TO Ho-shing, SGC (of that department) for the Appellant Mr Gerard McCoy SC, Mr Raymond Pierce and Ms Vandana Rajwani (instructed by M/s C.L. Chow & Lam) for the Respondent |
Other judgments that cite this case