Read the full judgment text of CACC 000227/1999 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 30 September 1999 before Stuart-Moore V.-P., Mayo & Leong JJ.A..
Criminal law – manslaughter – robbery – sentence – leave to appeal – manifestly excessive – totality – concurrent vs consecutive sentences – The applicant broke into the home of a 66-year-old woman, stole her possessions, and strangled her to death during the robbery. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter by reason of lack of intent and robbery. The trial judge imposed 8 years for manslaughter and 4 years consecutive for robbery, totaling 12 years. On application for leave to appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the sentence was not manifestly excessive given the gravity of the facts, and that a sentence in the region of 12 years is appropriate for manslaughter arising from robbery. The court noted that concurrent sentences would have been better practice but the overall sentence was not unjust. Application dismissed.
Legal issues: Leave to appeal against sentence
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
Cited by 2 cases