HKSAR v. Yang Min
Read the full judgment text of HCMA 555/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 January 2000.
1. This is an application by the appellant under s.32 of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap.484. The application is for a certificate under s.32(2) that a point of law of great and general importance is involved in my previous decision to dismiss his appeal against the decision of the magistrate. Alternatively the appellant seeks to show that substantial and grave injustice has been done in this matter. In so far as substantial and grave injustice is concerned, the appellant will
|
HCMA000555A/1999 HCMA555/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Appellate Jurisdiction) MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.555 OF 1999 (ON APPEAL FROM WSCC 2730 OF 1999) --------------------
-------------------- Coram: Hon Nguyen J in Court Date of Hearing: 12 January 2000 Date of Judgment: 12 January 2000 ---------------------- J U D G M E N T ---------------------- 1. This is an application by the appellant under s.32 of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap.484. The application is for a certificate under s.32(2) that a point of law of great and general importance is involved in my previous decision to dismiss his appeal against the decision of the magistrate. Alternatively the appellant seeks to show that substantial and grave injustice has been done in this matter. In so far as substantial and grave injustice is concerned, the appellant will need to make application directly to the Court of Final Appeal and satisfy that Court that there has been substantial and grave injustice. In so far as this Court is concerned, I can only certify if I am of that view that there is a point of law of great and general importance. 2. In my view, in this particular matter, there is no point of law of great and general importance which is involved in my decision. I therefore decline to grant the certificate sought by the appellant. The appellant is advised that if he wishes, he may apply directly to the Court of Final Appeal for leave to appeal.
Representation: Mr William Lam, SADPP of Department of Justice, for HKSAR Appellant in person, present |
Further hearings and rulings under HCMA 555/1999