Kithan Ltd. v. A & G International Cargo Ltd.
Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 14253/2000 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 14 November 2001.
1. I have decided that it would not be right to give you leave to appeal. I have obviously got to be as objective as I can in these matters, but I have looked at what you have had to say in terms of your proposed grounds of appeal. I have just looked at the Judgment again and I am afraid I am going to have to leave it to you to apply to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal. That is not as daunting as it sounds. The Court Office on the 6th Floor can give you advice as to what to do and you wil
|
DCCJ014253A/2000 DCCJ14253/2000 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION CIVIL ACTION NO. 14253 OF 2000
Coram: H H Judge Carlson in Court Date of Judgment: 14 November 2001 _______________________ R U L I N G _______________________ 1.I have decided that it would not be right to give you leave to appeal. I have obviously got to be as objective as I can in these matters, but I have looked at what you have had to say in terms of your proposed grounds of appeal. I have just looked at the Judgment again and I am afraid I am going to have to leave it to you to apply to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal. That is not as daunting as it sounds. The Court Office on the 6th Floor can give you advice as to what to do and you will apply for leave to appeal, if you wish to, to a single judge at the Court of Appeal in Chambers, as we are here. But so far as I am concerned, I do not think it would be right to give you leave to appeal. 2.I am afraid costs will have to follow the event on an application of this sort, so I am afraid the other side must have their costs of your application and to include the costs reserved on the previous occasion. So I am sorry, that is my decision.
Representation: Present: Mr Nareshkumar H. Basant, appearing in person, for the Plaintiff Ms Chang, Anne Mary, of Messrs Leung Kin & Co., for the Defendant |
Further hearings and rulings under DCCJ 14253/2000