The Jouster Ltd. v. Wang Ka Lueng Albert and Another
Read the full judgment text of HCA 5999/1999 on BabelCite. This High Court CFI judgment was delivered on 12 October 2001.
1. This assessment of damages arises out of the plaintiff's claim against the defendants for possession of a flat at Kency Tower, 9-9A Chatham Court, Tsim Sha Tsui, for arrears of rent, for mesne profits and for interest. Pursuant to court order, the plaintiff obtained possession of the property on 9th November 2000. Pursuant to court order judgment was entered against the defendants for damages to be assessed.
Cited by 2 cases
|
HCA005999A/1999 HCA 5999/1999 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ACTION NO. 5999 OF 1999 ____________________
____________________ Coram: Master Cannon in Court Date of Hearing: 8 October 2001 Date of Handing Down: 12 October 2001 ___________________________ ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES ___________________________ 1.This assessment of damages arises out of the plaintiff's claim against the defendants for possession of a flat at Kency Tower, 9-9A Chatham Court, Tsim Sha Tsui, for arrears of rent, for mesne profits and for interest. Pursuant to court order, the plaintiff obtained possession of the property on 9th November 2000. Pursuant to court order judgment was entered against the defendants for damages to be assessed. 2.At the assessment, the defendants were absent. The plaintiff's bundle of pleadings was before me at the assessment. The plaintiff was represented. Mr. Tang Kai Ming Kenneth, a director of the plaintiff company, filed a witness statement dated 10th June 2001, but he was unable to be at the hearing. He later filed an affirmation dated 10th October 2001, confirming the contents of his witness statement. I allowed this since it would save time and costs in what is a simple assessment of damages. In paragraph 4 of that witness statement, Mr. Tang sets out the calculation of the total amount of damages claimed, which is repeated in the affirmation of 10th October 2001 but with the amount of interest being up dated, being the sums of -
3.I accept the evidence of Tang Kai Ming Kenneth for the plaintiff, and I assess the damages at $301,866.78 and $1,973,150.82, together with interest in the sum of $88,226.14 up to 8th October 2001. Cost of the assessment be to the plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed.
Representation: Ms. Y.K. Tung of Messrs. Albert Hwang & Co. for Plaintiff. Defendants: Wang Ka Lueng Albert and Tong Pik Yin - Absent |
Other judgments that cite this case
Further hearings and rulings under HCA 5999/1999