Read the full judgment text of DCCJ 008670/1974 on BabelCite. This District Court judgment was delivered on 29 August 1975.
1. Both these actions arise out of hire-purchase agreements. One is brought against the hirer of the motor vehicle to which the agreement relates and the other against a guarantor as well as the hirer. In each the claim is for money but in each case it is a claim which is neither a claim for unliquidated damages nor a claim limited to the amount of instalments due and unpaid. If the actions had been brought in the Supreme Court there would be no doubt that judgment in default could only be enter