Read the full judgment text of HCCT 53/1999 and HCA 7968/1999 on BabelCite. This HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE judgment was delivered on 30 April 2003 before Hon Ma J.
Contract Law — Construction Contract — Sub-sub-contract — Existence and Terms of Contract — Performance and Breach — Delay — Defective Work — Damages. The fire services installation work for a residential housing development involved Thorn Security as nominated sub-contractor, initially subcontracting to Wise Engineering (WEC), who subcontracted part to Comtech. Due to WEC’s poor performance, Thorn terminated WEC and engaged Comtech. Dispute arose over whether a fixed price contract per purchase order PO 3164 existed or a cost-plus arrangement. The court held PO 3164 constituted the binding contract based on contemporaneous documents, conduct, and commercial reasonableness. Comtech was found in breach for delays and defective work, leading Thorn to take over the wet works and incur additional expenses. Thorn's counterclaim for damages for extra materials, labor, management time and overheads was upheld, while Comtech’s claim on a quantum meruit or cost-plus basis was dismissed. Claims for loss of profit and opportunity were rejected for insufficient evidence. Judgment was awarded to Thorn for $8.7 million with further directions on interest and costs. This case illustrates the importance of documentary and conduct evidence in establishing contract terms and the measure of damages for breach in complex construction subcontracts.
Legal issues: Existence and terms of contract between Comtech and Thorn · Thorn's breach of contract · Comtech's breach of contract for delay and defective work · Quantum of damages for Thorn's counterclaim
Outcome: Judgment given to Thorn in the sum of $8,713,949.51
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case