Read the full judgment text of HCCT 53/1999 and HCA 7968/1999 on BabelCite. This 高等法院原訟法庭 judgment was delivered on 30 April 2003 before Hon Ma J in Court.
Construction dispute — fire services installation sub-sub-contract — termination of original sub-sub-contractor WEC by Thorn — engagement of Comtech to take over work — existence and terms of contract — contract formed on terms of PO 3164 — Comtech's breach by delay and defective work — Thorn took over wet work due to delays — claims for damages for additional materials, labour, and management costs — quantum assessed by court — Comtech's quantum meruit claim rejected due to contract existence — loss of profit claims by Thorn rejected for lack of evidence — judgment for Thorn for $8.7 million — procedural history of consolidation and trial before Hon Ma J. The court found contemporaneous documents, correspondence and conduct demonstrated a binding contract based on purchase order 3164. Comtech's arguments of absence of contract or cost-plus basis rejected. Thorn was not in breach by withholding payment, given Comtech's breaches. Delay and defective work by Comtech justified Thorn's counterclaim. Quantum was carefully assessed with expert evidence and adjusted conservatively. This case highlights principles in construction contract formation, breach, and damages assessment.
Legal issues: Existence and terms of contract between Comtech and Thorn · Thorn's breach of contract · Comtech's breach of contract · Quantum of damages due to Thorn
Outcome: Judgment for Thorn in the sum of $8,713,949.51; Comtech's claim reduced to $3,606,609.56 which is less than Thorn's counterclaim.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case