Read the full judgment text of CACC 000274/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 17 December 1998.
1. The applicants jointly faced four charges of being agents using a false document to deceive their principal. These charges were laid under s.9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance. They also faced 12 charges of accepting an advantage as an agent, contrary to s.9(1)(b) of that Ordinance. They were convicted after trial before Judge Wilson in the District Court and, in each case, sentenced, overall, to imprisonment for one year. They now seek leave to appeal against those convictions.
Cited by 1 case