Read the full judgment text of CACC 000443/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 30 March 1999.
1. The Applicants (A1 and A2) are husband and wife. A2 the wife was convicted of two offences contrary to s.9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap. 201 (The Ordinance) and A1 was convicted of one offence under the section after a trial in the District Court before H.H. Judge Toh.
Cited by 1 case · Cites 1 case