Read the full judgment text of CACV 186/2003 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 24 June 2003.
1. The Respondents are associated companies. The 1st Respondent is the building manager and the 2nd Respondent owns various units including all the units on the two basement floors and three floors of the shopping arcade. The two basement floors were let to Sogo Department Store. About 1996 the 1st Respondent undertook certain renovation and alteration works in these three floors of the shopping arcade. The Applicants are various owners of units on the office floors and they are complaining abou