Read the full judgment text of CAAR 000006/1998 on BabelCite. This Court of Appeal judgment was delivered on 22 January 1999.
1. The Respondents, D1 and D2 respectively at trial, jointly faced four charges of being agents using a false document to deceive their principal. These charges were laid under s.9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, Cap.20 1 ("the Ordinance "). They also faced 12 charges of accepting an advantage as an agent, contrary to s.9(1)(b) of the Ordinance . They were convicted on 25th May 1998 after trial before Judge Wilson in the District Court and, in each case, sentenced, overall, to impriso