Ho Kam Yuen v. Tung Chee Hwa
Read the full judgment text of FAMV 16/2000 on BabelCite. This FAMV judgment was delivered on 7 July 2000 before Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Mr Justice Silke NPJ.
1. The Master struck out the applicant's Statement of Claim and dismissed his action against the respondent. The Judge affirmed the Master's decision. The Court of Appeal affirmed the Judge's decision. They all took the view that the applicant had no cause of action against the respondent. There is no reasonable prospect of the Court of Final Appeal taking a different view. The application is dismissed.
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
|
FAMV000016/2000 (Not for Circulation) IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 16 OF 2000 (CIVIL) (ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 315 OF 1999) _____________________
_____________________ Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Mr Justice Silke NPJ Date of Hearing: 7 July 2000 Date of Determination: 7 July 2000 _____________________________ D E T E R M I N A T I O N _____________________________ Mr Justice Litton PJ: 1. The Master struck out the applicant's Statement of Claim and dismissed his action against the respondent. The Judge affirmed the Master's decision. The Court of Appeal affirmed the Judge's decision. They all took the view that the applicant had no cause of action against the respondent. There is no reasonable prospect of the Court of Final Appeal taking a different view. The application is dismissed.
Representation: Mr Ho Kam Yuen, the Applicant, in person Miss Jenny Fung SGC (of Department of Justice) for the Respondent |